1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1118 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | DKW | Cadillac |
Model | F 11 | CTS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 11.3 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1868 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |