1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (156 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 730 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | F 11 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |
