1963 DKW Junior vs. 1976 Seat 133
To start off, 1976 Seat 133 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 843 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Seat 133 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 34 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Junior weights approximately 20 kg more than 1976 Seat 133.
Because 1976 Seat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Seat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 DKW Junior (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 DKW Junior will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Junior | 1976 Seat 133 | |
Make | DKW | Seat |
Model | Junior | 133 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 54 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 3460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2030 mm |