1963 DKW Junior vs. 1979 Triumph TR8
To start off, 1979 Triumph TR8 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Triumph TR8 (155 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Triumph TR8 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1963 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Triumph TR8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Triumph TR8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Junior | 1979 Triumph TR8 | |
| Make | DKW | Triumph |
| Model | Junior | TR8 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2170 mm |
