1963 DKW Junior vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW Junior. (71 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Junior | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Junior | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |