1963 DKW Junior vs. 2006 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (145 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 665 kg more than 1963 DKW Junior. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Croma (203 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW Junior. (71 Nm). This means 2006 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Junior | 2006 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | Junior | Croma |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 2197 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 94.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |
