1963 DKW Junior vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 227 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Junior, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW Junior. (71 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Junior | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | Junior | UTE |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |