1963 DKW Junior vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW Junior. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW Junior. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Junior | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | DKW | Citroen |
| Model | Junior | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
