1963 DKW Junior vs. 2012 Ford F-450
To start off, 2012 Ford F-450 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Junior. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Junior would be higher. At 6,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-450 (399 HP @ 2800 RPM) has 365 more horse power than 1963 DKW Junior. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Junior.
Because 2012 Ford F-450 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW Junior. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-450 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-450 (1,085 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 1014 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW Junior. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW Junior.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Junior | 2012 Ford F-450 | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Junior | F-450 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 6700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 399 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 1085 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3980 mm | 6680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2438 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2024 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 4379 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 142 L |