1963 DKW Munga vs. 1952 Morris Six
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Morris Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Morris Six would be higher. At 2,215 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Morris Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Morris Six (70 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Morris Six should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Morris Six weights approximately 110 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Morris Six. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1952 Morris Six | |
Make | DKW | Morris |
Model | Munga | Six |
Year Released | 1963 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2215 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |