1963 DKW Munga vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,636 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Rover P4 (108 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rover P4 weights approximately 338 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Rover P4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1956 Rover P4 | |
| Make | DKW | Rover |
| Model | Munga | P4 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2636 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1448 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 52 L |
