1963 DKW Munga vs. 1959 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Jaguar XK (265 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Jaguar XK weights approximately 363 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1959 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | DKW | Jaguar |
| Model | Munga | XK |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 87.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1473 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2600 mm |
