1963 DKW Munga vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 81 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1963 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |