1963 DKW Munga vs. 1961 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Sunbeam Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Sunbeam Alpine (80 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Sunbeam Alpine should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 115 kg more than 1961 Sunbeam Alpine.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Sunbeam Alpine. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1961 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | DKW | Sunbeam |
| Model | Munga | Alpine |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |
