1963 DKW Munga vs. 1965 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 1965 Triumph Vitesse is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,596 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph Vitesse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph Vitesse (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph Vitesse should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 230 kg more than 1965 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Triumph Vitesse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1965 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | DKW | Triumph |
Model | Munga | Vitesse |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 29 L |