1963 DKW Munga vs. 1966 Fiat OT
To start off, 1966 Fiat OT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,280 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Fiat OT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat OT (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat OT should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 355 kg more than 1966 Fiat OT.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Fiat OT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1966 Fiat OT | |
Make | DKW | Fiat |
Model | Munga | OT |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1280 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 37 L |