1963 DKW Munga vs. 1966 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1966 Maserati Mistral is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Maserati Mistral (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 155 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Maserati Mistral. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1966 Maserati Mistral | |
| Make | DKW | Maserati |
| Model | Munga | Mistral |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4014 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2410 mm |
