1963 DKW Munga vs. 1966 Renault 10
To start off, 1966 Renault 10 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Renault 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1966 Renault 10. (42 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 330 kg more than 1966 Renault 10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Renault 10. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1966 Renault 10 | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | Munga | 10 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 42 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 38 L |