1963 DKW Munga vs. 1967 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1967 Mercury Comet is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Comet weights approximately 550 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1967 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Comet |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3279 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2950 mm |
