1963 DKW Munga vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 402 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | Munga | Challenger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 6286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1512 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 75 L |