1963 DKW Munga vs. 1969 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1969 Jaguar 240 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Jaguar 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1969 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | Munga | 240 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 54 L |