1963 DKW Munga vs. 1969 Volvo 1800
To start off, 1969 Volvo 1800 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Volvo 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Volvo 1800 (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Volvo 1800 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Volvo 1800 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Volvo 1800. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1969 Volvo 1800 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | Munga | 1800 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |
