1963 DKW Munga vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire (130 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 223 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1979 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
Make | DKW | Oldsmobile |
Model | Munga | Starfire |
Year Released | 1963 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1333 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |