1963 DKW Munga vs. 1980 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1980 Holden Commodore is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,890 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 50 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1980 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | DKW | Holden |
| Model | Munga | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1890 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
