1963 DKW Munga vs. 1980 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1980 Toyota Corona is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Corona (89 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 125 kg more than 1980 Toyota Corona.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1980 Toyota Corona | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Munga | Corona |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 75 L |