1963 DKW Munga vs. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro (123 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 335 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1981 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Munga | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
