1963 DKW Munga vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1989 Toyota Celica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Toyota Celica (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Celica weights approximately 410 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Munga | Celica |
Year Released | 1963 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |