1963 DKW Munga vs. 1992 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1992 Toyota Camry is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota Camry (188 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Camry weights approximately 400 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1992 Toyota Camry | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | Munga | Camry |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |