1963 DKW Munga vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1994 Rover Range Rover is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,552 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (225 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | DKW | Rover |
Model | Munga | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1963 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 100 L |