1963 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E (347 HP) has 304 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 940 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1995 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Munga | E |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 4973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 347 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |