1963 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1995 Rover 200 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (144 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 30 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | DKW | Rover |
Model | Munga | 200 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |