1963 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Fiat Tempra
To start off, 1996 Fiat Tempra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Tempra (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Tempra should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 80 kg more than 1996 Fiat Tempra.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Fiat Tempra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1996 Fiat Tempra | |
Make | DKW | Fiat |
Model | Munga | Tempra |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1372 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 67.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |