1963 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 1996 Renault Megane is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Megane (113 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 10 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1996 Renault Megane | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | Munga | Megane |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
