1963 DKW Munga vs. 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche (325 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1625 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1999 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
| Make | DKW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Munga | Corniche |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 99.1 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 100 L |
