1963 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2000 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jeep Cherokee (120 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 320 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2000 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2464 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 98.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 81 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
