1963 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2000 Mazda Laputa is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1963 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda Laputa (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Laputa should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 360 kg more than 2000 Mazda Laputa.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mazda Laputa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2000 Mazda Laputa | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | Laputa |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 30 L |
