1963 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (161 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 430 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2000 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Munga | C |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 69 L |