1963 DKW Munga vs. 2000 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2000 SsangYong Musso is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Musso (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 720 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2000 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | DKW | SsangYong |
Model | Munga | Musso |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 73 L |