1963 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (137 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 399 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Volvo S60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | Munga | S60 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1509 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
