1963 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2001 Dodge Ram is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Dodge Ram (235 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Dodge Ram weights approximately 704 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2001 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | Munga | Ram |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1814 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |
