1963 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | DKW | Jeep |
Model | Munga | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2380 mm |