1963 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Mazda 6
To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda 6 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2001 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 164 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |