1963 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,398 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 610 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | Munga | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3270 mm |
