1963 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan
To start off, 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 820 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2002 Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | Munga | Grand Caravan |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |
