1963 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2002 Ford Explorer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Explorer (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Explorer weights approximately 870 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2002 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 59 L |
