1963 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 405 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 59 L |