1963 DKW Munga vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1963 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 320 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | DKW | MCC |
| Model | Munga | Smart |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 66.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 35 L |
