1963 DKW Munga vs. 2002 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2002 MG ZT-T is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG ZT-T weights approximately 515 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MG ZT-T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2002 MG ZT-T | |
Make | DKW | MG |
Model | Munga | ZT-T |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 82.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2830 mm |