1963 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Suzuki Twin
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Twin is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1963 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Twin. (42 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Twin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 510 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Twin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki Twin. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2002 Suzuki Twin | |
| Make | DKW | Suzuki |
| Model | Munga | Twin |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 42 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 2740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 21 L |
