1963 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Daewoo Evanda

To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 387 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Daewoo Evanda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1963 DKW Munga 2004 Daewoo Evanda
Make DKW Daewoo
Model Munga Evanda
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 980 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 43 HP 131 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 10.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type 4WD Front
Vehicle Weight 1110 kg 1497 kg
Vehicle Length 3450 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 31 L 65 L